<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech Talk &#187; Parallels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.philipsellers.com/category/virtualization/parallels-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.philipsellers.com</link>
	<description>Philip Sellers&#039; random thoughts on technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:07:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Fusion 2 versus Parallels Desktop 4</title>
		<link>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/12/01/vmware-fusion-2-versus-parallels-desktop-4/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/12/01/vmware-fusion-2-versus-parallels-desktop-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.philipsellers.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, for as much as Parallels touted their Desktop 4 product is 50% faster, I have to admit that I&#8217;m initially impressed with Fusion&#8217;s speed.  Its running extremely well on the same virutal machine that I imported from Parallels.  The only nagging problem is the stuipid Norton Antivirus which apparently thinks I have changed systems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for as much as Parallels touted their Desktop 4 product is 50% faster, I have to admit that I&#8217;m initially impressed with Fusion&#8217;s speed.  Its running extremely well on the same virutal machine that I imported from Parallels.  The only nagging problem is the stuipid Norton Antivirus which apparently thinks I have changed systems &#8211; as well as Windows that had to be reactivated&#8230; </p>
<p>Also, for anyone taking part of the Parallels conversion to Fusion &#8211; if you&#8217;re running the Desktop 4.0 product, you&#8217;ll need to use VMware&#8217;s converter product to transfer your virtual machine.  Fusion 2.0 cannot import the new format that Desktop 4.0 introduced.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Norton Antivirus is working fine after reboot&#8230; So, no problems in moving between Parallels Desktop 4.0 and VMware Fusion 2.0&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/12/01/vmware-fusion-2-versus-parallels-desktop-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Fusion for $10 for Parallel&#8217;s owners</title>
		<link>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/12/01/vmware-fusion-for-10-for-parallels-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/12/01/vmware-fusion-for-10-for-parallels-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallels Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtualPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.philipsellers.com/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I&#8217;ve blogged about my great problems with the Parallel&#8217;s Desktop 4.0 upgrade, I couldn&#8217;t not post this in case you&#8217;ve found yourself in the same boat.  VMware Fusion is being offered at 50% off for Cyber Monday.  (Just use the coupon code &#8220;CyberMondayDeal&#8221; on checkout).  In addition, if you are a Parallels Desktop or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I&#8217;ve blogged about my great problems with the Parallel&#8217;s Desktop 4.0 upgrade, I couldn&#8217;t not post this in case you&#8217;ve found yourself in the same boat.  VMware Fusion is being offered at 50% off for Cyber Monday.  (Just use the coupon code &#8220;CyberMondayDeal&#8221; on checkout).  In addition, if you are a Parallels Desktop or Microsoft VirtualPC owner then you qualify for an additional $30 rebate as a competative upgrade.</p>
<p>So, given that I had such a hard time, I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;ll buy &#8211; heck, $10 ain&#8217;t much &#8211; and give Fusion a real try, running it in production.  So, I guess I should revise my virtualization history to say &#8211; I&#8217;m now VMware at home and work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/12/01/vmware-fusion-for-10-for-parallels-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels Desktop 4.0 resolution &#8211; a.k.a. starting over</title>
		<link>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/26/parallels-4-resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/26/parallels-4-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallels Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.philipsellers.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, after a week of issues with the Parallels Desktop 4.0 upgrade, I trashed my VM that I have lovingly used for the past year and I have started over with a fresh import from the Virutal PC VHD file I keep on hand.  See, here is my history with Windows virtualization on the Mac:  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after a week of issues with the Parallels Desktop 4.0 upgrade, I trashed my VM that I have lovingly used for the past year and I have started over with a fresh import from the Virutal PC VHD file I keep on hand.  See, here is my history with Windows virtualization on the Mac:  I purchased a copy of Microsoft Office Professional for the Mac which included Virtual PC.  When I got my first Intel Mac, I became a Parallels Desktop Beta user, then purchased the real thing when it was released.  I&#8217;ve upgraded (paid upgrade, mind you) with each release since.<span id="more-188"></span></p>
<p>Virtual PC was a nice first step into the virtual world.  It came along at time when I was working for a University and was not in the sys admin world that I find myself today.  I found Virtual PC so sluggish and slow that I never was able to really use it.  So it collected dust on my hard drive for a year or longer before we purchased our first Intel Mac.</p>
<p>Around the same time as the Intel iMac purchase, Parallels released a beta of their Desktop product.  I quickly installed and used this version at home.  If memory serves, they did not have the Transporter product at that time and so I was forced to do an install of Windows XP.  The quick install for Windows was a great thing.</p>
<p>Fast forward to version 2 release for Desktop and I believe Parallels had added the Transporter feature &#8211; maybe that was version 3 &#8211; but anyways, that gave me the ability to utilize my actual Virtual PC image.  After a successful test, I reinstalled Virtual PC and loaded a fresh XP image.  Then I shutdown and saved the VHD file out on my NAS for the future&#8230;  That future was this week.</p>
<p>After importing my VHD file into Parallels Desktop, the automated upgrade process was very smooth.  It took some time, but everything completely successfully.   The image is very fast and starting with a clean image isn&#8217;t necessary a bad thing with Win-doze.  Unfortunately, I lost the few Windows applications that I depend on &#8211; Symantec Antivirus, Microsoft Money and the Savings Bond Wizard from the Treasury.</p>
<p>Both Symantec Antivirus and Microsoft Money are electronic delivery products.  And while I love the convenience of purchase and instantly download, reinstalls are a major pain.  In the 4 or so times I&#8217;ve reinstalled Microsoft Money, its always been a major pain to redownload and install the software.  So, I&#8217;m currently running a 60 day trial license and plan to pickup a box copy at Sam&#8217;s Club this weekend or next.</p>
<p>Norton Antivirus was far more of a let down.  Their new Norton Account &#8220;feature&#8221; and license restrictions is a big problem.  Granted, I was within a month of my current subscription expiring, but I found that I was unable to unlock and move my copy of Norton Antivirus to the new VM.   To that end, I purchased a new copy of the Antivirus at a much higher price point than my yearly upgrade.   I do like their subscription model, but the inflexibility of being able to move my copy as I move machines is a major pain.  Fortunately, I hope never to have to re-do my image again&#8230;</p>
<p>I think Symantec could do a much better job of allowing an unlock at least once a year or at least letting you move your subscription to a different PC.  Because of the activation process, they can lock down the Liveupdate process for virus definitions and updates.  So even if you leave the old copy running, you wouldn&#8217;t receive updates&#8230;  Anyways, just a pain, in my opinion.</p>
<p>But today, things are settling out.  I just upgraded to a brand new MacBook Pro and I have moved my Parallels Desktop 4 from the iMac to the new MacBook Pro and it is working fantastic.  I will say that the iMac seemed more sluggish running a Parallels Desktop 4.0 virtual machine configured with 512MB of RAM than the prior version did.  Maybe it was just my impression, but I didn&#8217;t think it was as fast.</p>
<p>The new version does add a lot of functionality, but it seems to be at the expense of performance &#8211; at least footprint &#8211; for the software.   Running the virtual machine does seem to be faster, though I&#8217;d beg to differ with the 50% increase in speed.  I will say that Parallels has always impressed me with how well it runs Windows XP.  Windows runs better on a Mac and in Parallels Desktop than on any piece of physical hardware I&#8217;ve ever run it on&#8230; so I&#8217;m just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/26/parallels-4-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels Desktop 4.0 &#8211; problems solved (maybe)</title>
		<link>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/12/parallels-desktop-40-problems-solved-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/12/parallels-desktop-40-problems-solved-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.philipsellers.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it seems that my problem isn&#8217;t with the new version of Parallels Desktop, but with the VM image that I have upgraded, several times.  A little background:  my Windows XP is a licensed copy originally purchased with Virtual PC back in the PowerPC days of Mac.  I imported this image into Parallels in version [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems that my problem isn&#8217;t with the new version of Parallels Desktop, but with the VM image that I have upgraded, several times.  A little background:  my Windows XP is a licensed copy originally purchased with Virtual PC back in the PowerPC days of Mac.  I imported this image into Parallels in version 2 and I have been using it in subsequent releases of the 3.0 product line without problems.  It seems that the strange mouse and driver problems that I was expericing in the VM are releated to the source of my image &#8211; Virtual PC.  I don&#8217;t know many specifics, but importing my VM using Parallel&#8217;s Transporter seems to have fixed the funkiness and solved my issues with drivers failing to install.  I found this solution and a <a href="http://forum.parallels.com/showthread.php?t=31176&amp;highlight=tools+install+fails">thread of other users expericing the same problems on the Parallels forums</a>.  Thanks to those users to contributed to this threat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/12/parallels-desktop-40-problems-solved-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update at on Parallels 4.0</title>
		<link>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/12/update-at-on-parallels-40/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/12/update-at-on-parallels-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catastrophe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.philipsellers.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, my upgrade has not gone smoothly.  My VM conversion failed in step 2.  I&#8217;m left with a virtual machine that is not doing so well, and I ran out of time last night to work on it.  So hopefully tonight, I can get some kinks worked out and get it back operational. Word of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my upgrade has not gone smoothly.  My VM conversion failed in step 2.  I&#8217;m left with a virtual machine that is not doing so well, and I ran out of time last night to work on it.  So hopefully tonight, I can get some kinks worked out and get it back operational.</p>
<p>Word of advice &#8211; though I don&#8217;t know if this has an impact&#8230; Remove your snapshots before you upgrade or convert your VM to version 4.0&#8230; I think it would make the upgrade much easier&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/12/update-at-on-parallels-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parallels releases Desktop 4.0</title>
		<link>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/11/parallels-releases-desktop-40/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/11/parallels-releases-desktop-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallels Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.philipsellers.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was an early adopter for the Intel Mac phenom.  Parallels was much faster to market with their Mac virtualization product and so I have been a loyal user of Parallels Desktop since it was introduced.  I have tried VMware Fusion and I&#8217;m fond of the product, but Apples to Apples (pun intended), the softwares [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was an early adopter for the Intel Mac phenom.  Parallels was much faster to market with their Mac virtualization product and so I have been a loyal user of Parallels Desktop since it was introduced.  I have tried VMware Fusion and I&#8217;m fond of the product, but Apples to Apples (pun intended), the softwares seem very similar and I think the competition between the two companies is a wonderful thing for me, the consumer.</p>
<p>Today I purchased my upgrade to <a href="http://www.parallels.com/products/desktop/">version 4.0 of Parallels Desktop</a> and I&#8217;m still in process of installing and upgrading my virtual machine.  I won&#8217;t say the install is painful &#8211; its very elegent and Mac like, but it has taken a couple hours now and I&#8217;m not finished yet&#8230;  The install was fast enough and I do immediately like the interface changes that I see presented before me.  I think Parallels has done a good job of making this new version very Mac-like.</p>
<p>The conversion process from the version 3.0 to 4.0 virtual machine has been a little painful &#8211; only in the sense of anticipation in running the VM.  This release is touted as 50% faster than the prior version and I&#8217;ve often bragged that Parallels runs Windows XP better than any Windows only machine I&#8217;ve ever encountered.  So to say this version is 50% faster, I&#8217;ve simply gotta see to believe.</p>
<p>Given that this conversion process is time consuming (my VM is approximately 25G), Parallels has smartly given me a &#8220;Take this time to learn about our newest features&#8221; overview of their changes.  One, I immediately noticed was the ability to virtualize Mac OS X on Mac OS X.  This is going to be a fun one to play with&#8230; now I just have to get into the Snow Leopard BETA program&#8230;</p>
<p>Other new features include Modality (a new view &#8211; not really sure what it actually is), improved Coherence, Safe Mode (a read-only mode for VMs &#8211; something VMware has had for a long time in their products), an iPhone interface to start and stop and otherwise control VMs (neat, but what&#8217;s it really worth?), and improved graphics support.  Coherence was one of the biggest new features I loved about this product.  VMware Fusion followed suit with their Unity feature and I think the ability to run Windows windows beside Mac apps seamlessly is great.  As far as improvements, the system tray from Windows has been integrated into the Mac OS X menu bar, which is good.  I think this will allow users to hide the nasty start bar when in Coherence.</p>
<p>I try and keep tabs on both products, but I have to confess &#8211; I&#8217;m a VMware user at work, Parallels at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.philipsellers.com/2008/11/11/parallels-releases-desktop-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
