Comments on: Our Pano Logic units have arrived

By: Donald

Donald — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:03:08 +0000

ProSync Technology Group has been working with Pano Logic for years now. If you find that you are not getting the answers you are looking for via the web look us up at http://www.prosync.com any of our VCP and PANO experts may have solved your issues already.

Be well
Don

By: Philip

Philip — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:03:36 +0000

Experiences has been largely good. We tried deploying them on T1 connections and the performance was not as good. We realized ahead of time that it may not work since its advertised as a LAN solution. Citrix apps within the Pano sometimes look choppy when paging through the application, but its very usable performance.

We went with View for two reasons:

1) View is advantageous from a licensing perspective to us. We didn’t want to mix our desktop VM’s onto our server VM cluster. It was much less costly to purchase View licensing for 30 VM’s and have two ESX hosts than to pay for two full ESX host license.

2) We expected that Pano would fit some of our business needs but not all. We plan on deploying other end-point devices and possibly experimenting with View for offline laptops use.

I agree, though, View is by no means a requirement. It worked in our particular case.

By: ITProfis

ITProfis — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:19:03 +0000

Interested in your experiences.

But why you wanna use View ?
Think the PanoDAS service together with the Panomgrsrv makes the connection to the Pano device not the view stuff.

ITP

By: Tech Talk » Blog Archive » VMware View implemented

Tech Talk » Blog Archive » VMware View implemented — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:08:49 +0000

[...] conference call. We evaluated and chose to implement VMware View to support the purchase of 50 Pano Logic thin client devices that we purchased end-of-year. The VMware View licensing model made more [...]